Comments on: Urinal protocol vulnerability http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/ The blag of the webcomic Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:54:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: badass http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-32375 badass Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:08:57 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-32375 this why i wear a Diaper this why i wear a Diaper

]]> By: henry http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-32018 henry Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:57:56 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-32018 Well, the formatting didn't really work that well, but you get the idea. Well, the formatting didn’t really work that well, but you get the idea.

]]> By: henry http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-32017 henry Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:56:27 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-32017 7 really isn't that bad... allow me to demonstrate * * * * * * * 1 4 3 2. Now is that really the end of the world? 7 really isn’t that bad… allow me to demonstrate
* * * * * * *
1 4 3 2.
Now is that really the end of the world?

]]> By: R. K. MacPherson http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31978 R. K. MacPherson Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:25:42 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31978 This is bloody brilliant. With mathematical certainty, we can determine the awkwardness quotient. Love XKCD. This is bloody brilliant. With mathematical certainty, we can determine the awkwardness quotient.

Love XKCD.

]]> By: Outlook 2010 http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31853 Outlook 2010 Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:12:38 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31853 Wow!I really loved reading your blog. It was very well written and simple to understand. Unlike additional blogs I have read.ASFASDFDS Wow!I really loved reading your blog. It was very well written and simple to understand. Unlike additional blogs I have read.ASFASDFDS

]]> By: nickolas http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31647 nickolas Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:08:02 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31647 I never thought someone would come out with some mathematical analysis for this! Good job! I would definitely love to read some female related issues, like their interaction with men, or some behavior change in a person, when a special someone is present and when not! I never thought someone would come out with some mathematical analysis for this! Good job!

I would definitely love to read some female related issues, like their interaction with men, or some behavior change in a person, when a special someone is present and when not!

]]> By: Harshil http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31638 Harshil Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:18:29 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31638 Nice Post, but The best way to avoid awkwardness in designing urinals is put stone slab of suffcient height between the urinals. Max efficency, minimum awkwardness Nice Post, but The best way to avoid awkwardness in designing urinals is put stone slab of suffcient height between the urinals. Max efficency, minimum awkwardness

]]> By: Satvik http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31636 Satvik Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:25:55 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31636 OMG! Just awesome! Nice post! :p OMG! Just awesome! Nice post! :p

]]> By: Sam http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31473 Sam Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:56:13 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31473 This is bloody hilarious. I also think the alcohol factor should be considered into the equation. More alcohol consumed over the evening reduces the 'aim' of the stream. As a result, more than one urinal space in between each participant should be a constant. Also, from my experience, most guys tend to use the actual toilets if only one person is at the urinals, irrespective of how many there are. How about this, use the closest urinal/trough, do your piss without cutting it short and spilling some on your pants because you dont want your wang out in public for too long. We are men! This evolutionary ability has set us well above women since the dawn of time. Embrace it! This is bloody hilarious. I also think the alcohol factor should be considered into the equation. More alcohol consumed over the evening reduces the ‘aim’ of the stream. As a result, more than one urinal space in between each participant should be a constant.
Also, from my experience, most guys tend to use the actual toilets if only one person is at the urinals, irrespective of how many there are.
How about this, use the closest urinal/trough, do your piss without cutting it short and spilling some on your pants because you dont want your wang out in public for too long.
We are men! This evolutionary ability has set us well above women since the dawn of time. Embrace it!

]]> By: Etiquette - The Only Podcast That Matters http://blog.xkcd.com/2009/09/02/urinal-protocol-vulnerability/comment-page-20/#comment-31461 Etiquette - The Only Podcast That Matters Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:30:39 +0000 http://blag.xkcd.com/?p=233#comment-31461 [...] further an more mathematical reading on urinal protocol, check out xkcd’s blog post about it. This entry was posted in My Personal Soapbox by Andrew. Bookmark the [...] [...] further an more mathematical reading on urinal protocol, check out xkcd’s blog post about it. This entry was posted in My Personal Soapbox by Andrew. Bookmark the [...]

]]>